2dc5cf1102
意図的な設計判断をレビュアーが誤検知（FP）しないよう、全 review-*.md に
{report:coder-decisions.md} の参照セクションを追加。ただし設計判断自体の
妥当性も評価する指示を含め、盲目的な通過を防ぐ。
26 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
26 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
Review the changes from the perspective of CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation) and Event Sourcing.
|
|
AI-specific issue review is not needed (already covered by the ai_review movement).
|
|
|
|
**Review criteria:**
|
|
- Aggregate design validity
|
|
- Event design (granularity, naming, schema)
|
|
- Command/Query separation
|
|
- Projection design
|
|
- Eventual consistency considerations
|
|
|
|
**Note**: If this project does not use the CQRS+ES pattern,
|
|
review from a general domain design perspective instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Design decisions reference:**
|
|
Review {report:coder-decisions.md} to understand the recorded design decisions.
|
|
- Do not flag intentionally documented decisions as FP
|
|
- However, also evaluate whether the design decisions themselves are sound, and flag any problems
|
|
|
|
## Judgment Procedure
|
|
|
|
1. Review the change diff and detect issues based on the CQRS and Event Sourcing criteria above
|
|
- Cross-check changes against REJECT criteria tables defined in knowledge
|
|
2. For each detected issue, classify as blocking/non-blocking based on Policy's scope determination table and judgment rules
|
|
3. If there is even one blocking issue, judge as REJECT
|