2dc5cf1102
意図的な設計判断をレビュアーが誤検知（FP）しないよう、全 review-*.md に
{report:coder-decisions.md} の参照セクションを追加。ただし設計判断自体の
妥当性も評価する指示を含め、盲目的な通過を防ぐ。
1.1 KiB
1.1 KiB
Review the changes from the perspective of CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation) and Event Sourcing. AI-specific issue review is not needed (already covered by the ai_review movement).
Review criteria:
- Aggregate design validity
- Event design (granularity, naming, schema)
- Command/Query separation
- Projection design
- Eventual consistency considerations
Note: If this project does not use the CQRS+ES pattern, review from a general domain design perspective instead.
Design decisions reference: Review {report:coder-decisions.md} to understand the recorded design decisions.
- Do not flag intentionally documented decisions as FP
- However, also evaluate whether the design decisions themselves are sound, and flag any problems
Judgment Procedure
- Review the change diff and detect issues based on the CQRS and Event Sourcing criteria above
- Cross-check changes against REJECT criteria tables defined in knowledge
- For each detected issue, classify as blocking/non-blocking based on Policy's scope determination table and judgment rules
- If there is even one blocking issue, judge as REJECT