takt/builtins/en/facets/knowledge/cqrs-es.md

CQRS+ES Knowledge

Aggregate Design

Aggregates hold only fields necessary for decision-making.

Command Model (Aggregate) role is to "receive commands, make decisions, and emit events". Query data is handled by Read Model (Projection).

"Necessary for decision" means:

• Used in if/require conditional branches
• Field value referenced when emitting events in instance methods

Criteria	Judgment
Aggregate spans multiple transaction boundaries	REJECT
Direct references between Aggregates (not ID references)	REJECT
Aggregate exceeds 100 lines	Consider splitting
Business invariants exist outside Aggregate	REJECT
Holding fields not used for decisions	REJECT

Good Aggregate:

// Only fields necessary for decisions
data class Order(
    val orderId: String,      // Used when emitting events
    val status: OrderStatus   // Used for state checking
) {
    fun confirm(confirmedBy: String): OrderConfirmedEvent {
        require(status == OrderStatus.PENDING) { "Cannot confirm in this state" }
        return OrderConfirmedEvent(
            orderId = orderId,
            confirmedBy = confirmedBy,
            confirmedAt = LocalDateTime.now()
        )
    }
}

// Holding fields not used for decisions (NG)
data class Order(
    val orderId: String,
    val customerId: String,     // Not used for decisions
    val shippingAddress: Address, // Not used for decisions
    val status: OrderStatus
)

Aggregates with no additional operations have ID only:

// When only creation, no additional operations
data class Notification(val notificationId: String) {
    companion object {
        fun create(customerId: String, message: String): NotificationCreatedEvent {
            return NotificationCreatedEvent(
                notificationId = UUID.randomUUID().toString(),
                customerId = customerId,
                message = message
            )
        }
    }
}

Event Design

Criteria	Judgment
Event not in past tense (Created → Create)	REJECT
Event contains logic	REJECT
Event contains internal state of other Aggregates	REJECT
Event schema not version controlled	Warning
CRUD-style events (Updated, Deleted)	Needs review

Good Events:

// Good: Domain intent is clear
OrderPlaced, PaymentReceived, ItemShipped

// Bad: CRUD style
OrderUpdated, OrderDeleted

Event Granularity:

• Too fine: OrderFieldChanged → Domain intent unclear
• Appropriate: ShippingAddressChanged → Intent is clear
• Too coarse: OrderModified → What changed is unclear

Command Handlers

Criteria	Judgment
Handler directly manipulates DB	REJECT
Handler modifies multiple Aggregates	REJECT
No command validation	REJECT
Handler executes queries to make decisions	Needs review

Good Command Handler:

1. Receive command
2. Restore Aggregate from event store
3. Apply command to Aggregate
4. Save emitted events

Projection Design

Criteria	Judgment
Projection issues commands	REJECT
Projection references Write model	REJECT
Single projection serves multiple use cases	Needs review
Design that cannot be rebuilt	REJECT

Good Projection:

• Optimized for specific read use case
• Idempotently reconstructible from events
• Completely independent from Write model

Query Side Design

Controller uses QueryGateway. Does not use Repository directly.

Types between layers:

• application/query/ - Query result types (e.g., OrderDetail)
• adapter/protocol/ - REST response types (e.g., OrderDetailResponse)
• QueryHandler returns application layer types, Controller converts to adapter layer types

// application/query/OrderDetail.kt
data class OrderDetail(
    val orderId: String,
    val customerName: String,
    val totalAmount: Money
)

// adapter/protocol/OrderDetailResponse.kt
data class OrderDetailResponse(...) {
    companion object {
        fun from(detail: OrderDetail) = OrderDetailResponse(...)
    }
}

// QueryHandler - returns application layer type
@QueryHandler
fun handle(query: GetOrderDetailQuery): OrderDetail? {
    val entity = repository.findById(query.id) ?: return null
    return OrderDetail(...)
}

// Controller - converts to adapter layer type
@GetMapping("/{id}")
fun getById(@PathVariable id: String): ResponseEntity<OrderDetailResponse> {
    val detail = queryGateway.query(
        GetOrderDetailQuery(id),
        OrderDetail::class.java
    ).join() ?: throw NotFoundException("...")

    return ResponseEntity.ok(OrderDetailResponse.from(detail))
}

Structure:

Controller (adapter) → QueryGateway → QueryHandler (application) → Repository
     ↓                                      ↓
Response.from(detail)                  OrderDetail

Eventual Consistency

Situation	Response
UI expects immediate updates	Redesign or polling/WebSocket
Consistency delay exceeds tolerance	Reconsider architecture
Compensating transactions undefined	Request failure scenario review

Saga vs EventHandler

Saga is used only for "operations between multiple aggregates where contention occurs".

Cases where Saga is needed:

When multiple actors compete for the same resource
Example: Inventory reservation (10 people ordering the same product simultaneously)

OrderPlacedEvent
  ↓ InventoryReservationSaga
ReserveInventoryCommand → Inventory aggregate (serializes concurrent execution)
  ↓
InventoryReservedEvent → ConfirmOrderCommand
InventoryReservationFailedEvent → CancelOrderCommand

Cases where Saga is not needed:

Non-competing operations
Example: Inventory release on order cancellation

OrderCancelledEvent
  ↓ InventoryReleaseHandler (simple EventHandler)
ReleaseInventoryCommand
  ↓
InventoryReleasedEvent

Decision criteria:

Situation	Saga	EventHandler
Resource contention exists	Use	-
Compensating transaction needed	Use	-
Non-competing simple coordination	-	Use
Retry on failure is sufficient	-	Use

Anti-pattern:

// NG - Using Saga for lifecycle management
@Saga
class OrderLifecycleSaga {
    // Tracking all order state transitions in Saga
    // PLACED → CONFIRMED → SHIPPED → DELIVERED
}

// OK - Saga only for operations requiring eventual consistency
@Saga
class InventoryReservationSaga {
    // Only for inventory reservation concurrency control
}

Saga is not a lifecycle management tool. Create it per "operation" that requires eventual consistency.

Exception vs Event (Failure Handling)

Failures not requiring audit use exceptions, failures requiring audit use events.

Exception approach (recommended: most cases):

// Domain model: Throws exception on validation failure
fun reserveInventory(orderId: String, quantity: Int): InventoryReservedEvent {
    if (availableQuantity < quantity) {
        throw InsufficientInventoryException("Insufficient inventory")
    }
    return InventoryReservedEvent(productId, orderId, quantity)
}

// Saga: Catch with exceptionally and perform compensating action
commandGateway.send<Any>(command)
    .exceptionally { ex ->
        commandGateway.send<Any>(CancelOrderCommand(
            orderId = orderId,
            reason = ex.cause?.message ?: "Inventory reservation failed"
        ))
        null
    }

Event approach (rare cases):

// Only when audit is required
data class PaymentFailedEvent(
    val paymentId: String,
    val reason: String,
    val attemptedAmount: Money
) : PaymentEvent

Decision criteria:

Question	Exception	Event
Need to check this failure later?	No	Yes
Required by regulations/compliance?	No	Yes
Only Saga cares about the failure?	Yes	No
Is there value in keeping it in Event Store?	No	Yes

Default is exception approach. Consider events only when audit requirements exist.

Abstraction Level Evaluation

Conditional branch proliferation detection:

Pattern	Judgment
Same if-else pattern in 3+ places	Abstract with polymorphism → REJECT
switch/case with 5+ branches	Consider Strategy/Map pattern
Event type branching proliferating	Separate event handlers → REJECT
Complex state branching in Aggregate	Consider State Pattern

Abstraction level mismatch detection:

Pattern	Problem	Fix
DB operation details in CommandHandler	Responsibility violation	Separate to Repository layer
Business logic in EventHandler	Responsibility violation	Extract to domain service
Persistence in Aggregate	Layer violation	Change to EventStore route
Calculation logic in Projection	Hard to maintain	Extract to dedicated service

Good abstraction examples:

// Event type branching proliferation (NG)
@EventHandler
fun on(event: DomainEvent) {
    when (event) {
        is OrderPlacedEvent -> handleOrderPlaced(event)
        is OrderConfirmedEvent -> handleOrderConfirmed(event)
        is OrderShippedEvent -> handleOrderShipped(event)
        // ...keeps growing
    }
}

// Separate handlers per event (OK)
@EventHandler
fun on(event: OrderPlacedEvent) { ... }

@EventHandler
fun on(event: OrderConfirmedEvent) { ... }

@EventHandler
fun on(event: OrderShippedEvent) { ... }

// Complex state branching (NG)
fun process(command: ProcessCommand) {
    when (status) {
        PENDING -> if (command.type == "approve") { ... } else if (command.type == "reject") { ... }
        APPROVED -> if (command.type == "ship") { ... }
        // ...gets complex
    }
}

// Abstracted with State Pattern (OK)
sealed class OrderState {
    abstract fun handle(command: ProcessCommand): List<DomainEvent>
}
class PendingState : OrderState() {
    override fun handle(command: ProcessCommand) = when (command) {
        is ApproveCommand -> listOf(OrderApprovedEvent(...))
        is RejectCommand -> listOf(OrderRejectedEvent(...))
        else -> throw InvalidCommandException()
    }
}

Anti-pattern Detection

REJECT if found:

Anti-pattern	Problem
CRUD Disguise	Just splitting CRUD into Command/Query
Anemic Domain Model	Aggregate is just a data structure
Event Soup	Meaningless events proliferate
Temporal Coupling	Implicit dependency on event order
Missing Events	Important domain events are missing
God Aggregate	All responsibilities in one Aggregate

Test Strategy

Separate test strategies by layer.

Test Pyramid:

        ┌─────────────┐
        │   E2E Test  │  ← Few: Overall flow confirmation
        ├─────────────┤
        │ Integration │  ← Command→Event→Projection→Query coordination
        ├─────────────┤
        │  Unit Test  │  ← Many: Each layer tested independently
        └─────────────┘

Command side (Aggregate):

// Using AggregateTestFixture
@Test
fun `confirm command emits event`() {
    fixture
        .given(OrderPlacedEvent(...))
        .`when`(ConfirmOrderCommand(orderId, confirmedBy))
        .expectSuccessfulHandlerExecution()
        .expectEvents(OrderConfirmedEvent(...))
}

Query side:

// Direct Read Model setup + QueryGateway
@Test
fun `can get order details`() {
    // Given: Setup Read Model directly
    orderRepository.save(OrderEntity(...))

    // When: Execute query via QueryGateway
    val detail = queryGateway.query(GetOrderDetailQuery(orderId), ...).join()

    // Then
    assertEquals(expectedDetail, detail)
}

Checklist:

Aspect	Judgment
Aggregate tests verify events not state	Required
Query side tests don't create data via Command	Recommended
Integration tests consider Axon async processing	Required

Infrastructure Layer

Check:

• Is event store choice appropriate?
• Does messaging infrastructure meet requirements?
• Is snapshot strategy defined?
• Is event serialization format appropriate?