takt/builtins/en/knowledge/research.md

2.2 KiB

Research Methodology Knowledge

Data Reliability Evaluation

Data quality is determined by source reliability and clarity of documentation.

Criterion Judgment
Numbers from official statistics (government, municipality) High reliability
Numbers in news articles (with source) Medium reliability
Numbers from personal blogs/SNS (no source) Low reliability
Year/date of numbers is specified OK
Year/date of numbers is unknown Warning
Based on primary sources (official documents, originals) OK
Secondary sources only, primary source unverifiable Warning

Data Source Priority

Priority Data Source Examples
1 Government statistics/white papers Census, ministry statistics
2 Municipal open data City statistical reports, open data portals
3 Industry groups/research institutions Think tanks, academic research
4 News (with primary source reference) Newspapers, specialized media
5 News (without primary source) Secondary reports, aggregation articles

Qualitative Analysis Evaluation

Quality of qualitative analysis is evaluated by logical causality and concrete evidence.

Criterion Judgment
Claims causation with mechanism explanation OK
Claims causation but only correlation exists Warning
Digs into structural factors OK
Stops at surface-level explanation Insufficient
Backed by concrete examples, system names OK
Abstract explanation only Insufficient

Distinguishing Causation from Correlation

"A and B occur together" is correlation. "A causes B" is causation. Claiming causation requires mechanism explanation or elimination of alternative factors.

Handling Un-researchable Items

Report honestly when items cannot be researched. Do not fill gaps with speculation.

Situation Response
Data is not public Report "Unable to research" with reason
Data exists but not found Report "Not found" with locations searched
Only partial data available Report what was found, note gaps
Want to supplement with speculation Clearly mark as speculation with reasoning