2dc5cf1102
意図的な設計判断をレビュアーが誤検知（FP）しないよう、全 review-*.md に
{report:coder-decisions.md} の参照セクションを追加。ただし設計判断自体の
妥当性も評価する指示を含め、盲目的な通過を防ぐ。
1.6 KiB
1.6 KiB
Focus on reviewing Terraform convention compliance. Do not review AI-specific issues (already covered by the ai_review movement).
Review criteria:
- Variable declaration compliance (type, description, sensitive)
- Resource naming consistency (name_prefix pattern)
- File organization compliance (one file per concern)
- Security configurations (IMDSv2, encryption, access control, IAM least privilege)
- Tag management (default_tags, no duplication)
- Lifecycle rule appropriateness
- Cost trade-off documentation
- Unused variables / outputs / data sources
Design decisions reference: Review {report:coder-decisions.md} to understand the recorded design decisions.
- Do not flag intentionally documented decisions as FP
- However, also evaluate whether the design decisions themselves are sound, and flag any problems
Previous finding tracking (required):
- First, extract open findings from "Previous Response"
- Assign
finding_idto each finding and classify current status asnew / persists / resolved - If status is
persists, provide concrete unresolved evidence (file/line)
Judgment Procedure
- First, extract previous open findings and preliminarily classify as
new / persists / resolved - Review the change diff and detect issues based on Terraform convention criteria
- Cross-check changes against REJECT criteria tables defined in knowledge
- For each detected issue, classify as blocking/non-blocking based on Policy's scope determination table and judgment rules
- If there is even one blocking issue (
neworpersists), judge as REJECT