takt/resources/global/en/workflows/minimal.yaml

# Minimal TAKT Workflow
# Implement -> Parallel Review (AI + Supervisor) -> Fix if needed -> Complete
# (Simplest configuration - no plan, no architect review)
#
# Template Variables (auto-injected):
#   {iteration}      - Workflow-wide turn count (total steps executed across all agents)
#   {max_iterations} - Maximum iterations allowed for the workflow
#   {step_iteration} - Per-step iteration count (how many times THIS step has been executed)
#   {task}           - Original user request (auto-injected)
#   {previous_response} - Output from the previous step (auto-injected)
#   {user_inputs}    - Accumulated user inputs during workflow (auto-injected)
#   {report_dir}     - Report directory name (e.g., "20250126-143052-task-summary")

name: minimal
description: Minimal development workflow (implement -> parallel review -> fix if needed -> complete)

max_iterations: 20

initial_step: implement

steps:
  - name: implement
    edit: true
    agent: ../agents/default/coder.md
    report:
      - Scope: 01-coder-scope.md
      - Decisions: 02-coder-decisions.md
    allowed_tools:
      - Read
      - Glob
      - Grep
      - Edit
      - Write
      - Bash
      - WebSearch
      - WebFetch
    permission_mode: edit
    instruction_template: |
      Implement the task.
      Use only the Report Directory files shown in Workflow Context. Do not search or open reports outside that directory.

      **Scope report format (create at implementation start):**
      ```markdown
      # Change Scope Declaration

      ## Task
      {One-line task summary}

      ## Planned Changes
      | Type | File |
      |------|------|
      | Create | `src/example.ts` |
      | Modify | `src/routes.ts` |

      ## Estimated Size
      Small / Medium / Large

      ## Impact Scope
      - {Affected modules or features}
      ```

      **Decisions report format (on completion, only if decisions were made):**
      ```markdown
      # Decision Log

      ## 1. {Decision Content}
      - **Background**: {Why the decision was needed}
      - **Options Considered**: {List of options}
      - **Reason**: {Why this option was chosen}
      ```

      **Required output (include headings)**
      ## Work done
      - {summary of work performed}
      ## Changes made
      - {summary of code changes}
      ## Test results
      - {command and outcome}

    rules:
      - condition: Implementation complete
        next: reviewers
      - condition: Cannot proceed, insufficient info
        next: ABORT
      - condition: User input required because there are items to confirm with the user
        next: implement
        requires_user_input: true
        interactive_only: true

  - name: reviewers
    parallel:
      - name: ai_review
        edit: false
        agent: ../agents/default/ai-antipattern-reviewer.md
        report:
          name: 03-ai-review.md
          format: |
            ```markdown
            # AI-Generated Code Review

            ## Result: APPROVE / REJECT

            ## Summary
            {One sentence summarizing result}

            ## Verified Items
            | Aspect | Result | Notes |
            |--------|--------|-------|
            | Assumption validity | ✅ | - |
            | API/Library existence | ✅ | - |
            | Context fit | ✅ | - |
            | Scope | ✅ | - |

            ## Issues (if REJECT)
            | # | Category | Location | Issue |
            |---|----------|----------|-------|
            | 1 | Hallucinated API | `src/file.ts:23` | Non-existent method |
            ```

            **Cognitive load reduction rules:**
            - No issues -> Summary 1 line + check table only (10 lines or less)
            - Issues found -> + Issues in table format (25 lines or less)
        allowed_tools:
          - Read
          - Glob
          - Grep

          - WebSearch
          - WebFetch
        instruction_template: |
          Review the code for AI-specific issues:
          - Assumption validation
          - Plausible but wrong patterns
          - Context fit with existing codebase
          - Scope creep detection
        rules:
          - condition: No AI-specific issues
          - condition: AI-specific issues found

      - name: supervise
        edit: false
        agent: ../agents/default/supervisor.md
        report:
          - Validation: 05-supervisor-validation.md
          - Summary: summary.md
        allowed_tools:
          - Read
          - Glob
          - Grep

          - Bash
          - WebSearch
          - WebFetch
        instruction_template: |
          Run tests, verify the build, and perform final approval.

          **Workflow Overall Review:**
          1. Does the implementation meet the original request?
          2. Were AI Review issues addressed?
          3. Was the original task objective achieved?

          **Review Reports:** Read all reports in Report Directory and
          check for any unaddressed improvement suggestions.

          **Validation report format:**
          ```markdown
          # Final Validation Results

          ## Result: APPROVE / REJECT

          ## Validation Summary
          | Item | Status | Verification Method |
          |------|--------|---------------------|
          | Requirements met | ✅ | Matched against requirements list |
          | Tests | ✅ | `npm test` (N passed) |
          | Build | ✅ | `npm run build` succeeded |
          | Functional check | ✅ | Main flows verified |

          ## Deliverables
          - Created: {Created files}
          - Modified: {Modified files}

          ## Incomplete Items (if REJECT)
          | # | Item | Reason |
          |---|------|--------|
          | 1 | {Item} | {Reason} |
          ```

          **Summary report format (only if APPROVE):**
          ```markdown
          # Task Completion Summary

          ## Task
          {Original request in 1-2 sentences}

          ## Result
          ✅ Complete

          ## Changes
          | Type | File | Summary |
          |------|------|---------|
          | Create | `src/file.ts` | Summary description |

          ## Review Results
          | Review | Result |
          |--------|--------|
          | AI Review | ✅ APPROVE |
          | Supervisor | ✅ APPROVE |

          ## Verification Commands
          ```bash
          npm test
          npm run build
          ```
          ```
        rules:
          - condition: All checks passed
          - condition: Requirements unmet, tests failing

    rules:
      - condition: all("No AI-specific issues", "All checks passed")
        next: COMPLETE
      - condition: all("AI-specific issues found", "Requirements unmet, tests failing")
        next: fix_both
      - condition: any("AI-specific issues found")
        next: ai_fix
      - condition: any("Requirements unmet, tests failing")
        next: supervise_fix

  - name: fix_both
    parallel:
      - name: ai_fix_parallel
        edit: true
        agent: ../agents/default/coder.md
        allowed_tools:
          - Read
          - Glob
          - Grep
          - Edit

          - Bash
          - WebSearch
          - WebFetch
        permission_mode: edit
        pass_previous_response: true
        rules:
          - condition: AI Reviewer's issues fixed
          - condition: No fix needed (verified target files/spec)
          - condition: Cannot proceed, insufficient info
        instruction_template: |
          **This is AI Review iteration {step_iteration}.**

          If this is iteration 2 or later, it means your previous fixes were not actually applied.
          **Your belief that you "already fixed it" is wrong.**

          **First, acknowledge:**
          - Files you thought were "fixed" are actually not fixed
          - Your understanding of previous work is incorrect
          - You need to start from zero

          **Required actions:**
          1. Open all flagged files with Read tool (drop assumptions, verify facts)
          2. Search for problem code with grep to confirm it exists
          3. Fix confirmed problems with Edit tool
          4. Run tests to verify (e.g., `npm test`, `./gradlew test`)
          5. Report specifically "what you checked and what you fixed"

          **Report format:**
          - ❌ "Already fixed"
          - ✅ "Checked file X at L123, found problem Y, fixed to Z"

          **Absolutely prohibited:**
          - Reporting "fixed" without opening files
          - Judging based on assumptions
          - Leaving problems that AI Reviewer REJECTED

          **Handling "no fix needed" (required)**
          - Do not claim "no fix needed" unless you can show the checked target file(s) for each AI Review issue
          - If an issue involves generated code or spec sync, and you cannot verify the source spec, output the tag for "Cannot proceed, insufficient info"
          - When "no fix needed", output the tag for "Cannot proceed, insufficient info" and include the reason + checked scope

          **Required output (include headings)**
          ## Files checked
          - {path:line}
          ## Searches run
          - {command and summary}
          ## Fixes applied
          - {what changed}
          ## Test results
          - {command and outcome}

      - name: supervise_fix_parallel
        edit: true
        agent: ../agents/default/coder.md
        allowed_tools:
          - Read
          - Glob
          - Grep
          - Edit

          - Bash
          - WebSearch
          - WebFetch
        permission_mode: edit
        pass_previous_response: true
        rules:
          - condition: Supervisor's issues fixed
          - condition: Cannot proceed, insufficient info
        instruction_template: |
          Fix the issues pointed out by the supervisor.

          The supervisor has identified issues from a big-picture perspective.
          Address items in priority order.

          **Required output (include headings)**
          ## Work done
          - {summary of work performed}
          ## Changes made
          - {summary of code changes}
          ## Test results
          - {command and outcome}
          ## Evidence
          - {key files/grep/diff/log evidence you verified}

    rules:
      - condition: all("AI Reviewer's issues fixed", "Supervisor's issues fixed")
        next: reviewers
      - condition: any("No fix needed (verified target files/spec)", "Cannot proceed, insufficient info")
        next: implement

  - name: ai_fix
    edit: true
    agent: ../agents/default/coder.md
    allowed_tools:
      - Read
      - Glob
      - Grep
      - Edit
      - Write
      - Bash
      - WebSearch
      - WebFetch
    permission_mode: edit
    pass_previous_response: true
    rules:
      - condition: AI Reviewer's issues fixed
        next: reviewers
      - condition: No fix needed (verified target files/spec)
        next: implement
      - condition: Cannot proceed, insufficient info
        next: implement
    instruction_template: |
      **This is AI Review iteration {step_iteration}.**

      If this is iteration 2 or later, it means your previous fixes were not actually applied.
      **Your belief that you "already fixed it" is wrong.**

      **First, acknowledge:**
      - Files you thought were "fixed" are actually not fixed
      - Your understanding of previous work is incorrect
      - You need to start from zero

      **Required actions:**
      1. Open all flagged files with Read tool (drop assumptions, verify facts)
      2. Search for problem code with grep to confirm it exists
      3. Fix confirmed problems with Edit tool
      4. Run tests to verify (e.g., `npm test`, `./gradlew test`)
      5. Report specifically "what you checked and what you fixed"

      **Report format:**
      - ❌ "Already fixed"
      - ✅ "Checked file X at L123, found problem Y, fixed to Z"

      **Absolutely prohibited:**
      - Reporting "fixed" without opening files
      - Judging based on assumptions
      - Leaving problems that AI Reviewer REJECTED

      **Handling "no fix needed" (required)**
      - Do not claim "no fix needed" unless you can show the checked target file(s) for each AI Review issue
      - If an issue involves generated code or spec sync, and you cannot verify the source spec, output the tag for "Cannot proceed, insufficient info"
      - When "no fix needed", output the tag for "Cannot proceed, insufficient info" and include the reason + checked scope

      **Required output (include headings)**
      ## Files checked
      - {path:line}
      ## Searches run
      - {command and summary}
      ## Fixes applied
      - {what changed}
      ## Test results
      - {command and outcome}

  - name: supervise_fix
    edit: true
    agent: ../agents/default/coder.md
    allowed_tools:
      - Read
      - Glob
      - Grep
      - Edit
      - Write
      - Bash
      - WebSearch
      - WebFetch
    permission_mode: edit
    pass_previous_response: true
    rules:
      - condition: Supervisor's issues fixed
        next: reviewers
      - condition: Cannot proceed, insufficient info
        next: implement
    instruction_template: |
      Fix the issues pointed out by the supervisor.

      The supervisor has identified issues from a big-picture perspective.
      Address items in priority order.

      **Required output (include headings)**
      ## Work done
      - {summary of work performed}
      ## Changes made
      - {summary of code changes}
      ## Test results
      - {command and outcome}
      ## Evidence
      - {key files/grep/diff/log evidence you verified}