Review the changes from a test quality perspective.

**Review criteria:**
- Whether all test plan items are covered
- Test quality (Given-When-Then structure, independence, reproducibility)
- Test naming conventions
- Completeness (unnecessary tests, missing cases)
- Appropriateness of mocks and fixtures


**Design decisions reference:**
Review {report:coder-decisions.md} to understand the recorded design decisions.
- Do not flag intentionally documented decisions as FP
- However, also evaluate whether the design decisions themselves are sound, and flag any problems

## Judgment Procedure

1. Cross-reference the test plan/test scope reports in the Report Directory with the implemented tests
2. For each detected issue, classify as blocking/non-blocking based on Policy's scope determination table and judgment rules
3. If there is even one blocking issue, judge as REJECT